Karin von Ompteda & Peter Crnokrak

Dec 21st, 2009
9 Comments

Karin von Ompteda & Peter Crnokrak

Karin von Ompteda & Peter Crnokrak

Karin von Ompteda & Peter Crnokrak

Karin von Ompteda & Peter Crnokrak

Karin von Ompteda & Peter Crnokrak

Royal College of Art Research RCA Exhibition Catalogue
Design Karin von Ompteda & Peter Crnokrak

“Research RCA, with 100+ students, plays a key role in the development of research in art and design on both a national and international level. In its continuing commitment to promote the work of its student body, the College for the first time this year undertook a review of student work in exhibition form.

Our role as curators, exhibition and graphic designers was to balance the needs of individual students exhibiting their work with that of representing the student body as a whole while being keenly aware to promote the unique qualities of Research RCA.

As an accompaniment to the exhibition, we designed an A3 catalogue that verbally and pictorially describes the work of seven students chosen to represent the seven different schools that comprise Research RCA. The department also requested a means by which to represent the entire student body–in particular to visually represent the complex varietal make-up of the within and extra-college dynamics that influence the output of research. To this end, we created an information visualisation that shows the distribution of all Research students across departments. Each student was recorded with regard to school, department, degree type (MPhil or PhD), project type (Project or Thesis), status (Part or Full-Time), nationality and relationships to collaborators and funding agencies (arched connection lines). The typography-only data visualisation capitalizes on the inherent form differences between typefaces to allow for visual differentiation of the above categories. The manner in which we used Lineto’s Akkurat (three weights and italics) and Hoefler & Frere-Jones’ Didot (three weights and italics + seven contrast variants) allowed for a visually flexible system of form relationships in representing data while at the same time imbuing the visualisation with a distinctly ‘graphic design’ feel.

The end result is a complex, though surprisingly telling snapshot of the Research RCA student body and the relations they bare with national and international art and design agencies and institutions.”

Acknowledgements: Peter for the /images and the article information :)


This post is tagged ,

9 Comments

  1. The logo killed it… :(

  2. I saw this a couple of weeks back and it’s another beauty from Peter.

    Personally, I think the logo looks fine – maybe it could have been foiled too though?

  3. I don’t mind the logo. The ‘ instead of an ’ bothers me a bit but that’s all — I’m ridiculously pedantic about punctuation. It really doesn’t matter and I don’t know why it bothers me.

    Always nice to see something from my old college too.

  4. Grez

    I understand the remit to push the aesthetic of information design but I think this poster is borderlining on disfunction. The most communicative element being the typography at the bottom – announcing the date/venue/time etc, but the information displaying the names of the students and courses confuses the hell out of me.

  5. Reading the information visualisation (not actually a poster) would be easier were it real size. However, even at the size shown above, differentiation of information is still quite clear. The most logical way to read the graph is from the inside out – the 7 schools (eg. Humanities) differentiate amongst each other due to name length (bold Akkurat + tight leading allow for patterns to be created) – Humanities has a disproportionately large representation at RCA. This same logic applies as one reads outwards – department, degree type etc. differentiate through the careful use of type variation (clusters and patterns form that bind like-with-like). The bottom section of the graph (all caps Didot bold – to make this section look different from the student info) represents the various funding bodies – a critical element for Research students. The connection lines running from the funding bodies to the individual students names shows a remarkable concentration from a few notable sources (eg. the RCA itself funds a vast majority of students), in addition to the V&A and the Arts and Humanities Research Council.

    As with all visualisation, one has to spend time with the information to fully understand what is being shown. The proof of the visualisation functionality is the overall patterned effect that the type displays – the graph looks like a tree-ring pattern – and can be read in the same manner.

  6. Jesse Kidwell

    I think that because such a lengthy description is necessary the poster might not work so well as a piece of information design. I think the connections that are being made with the lines are not worth the confusion that’s created by running the typography 360 degrees. Myself nor Grez are not trying to attack, just a critique.

  7. Absolutely beautiful, i think it exhibits a remarkably quick way to find the relationships and contingency between raw information. The data available seems dense but does not feel cluttered in it’s presentation.. i think if i wanted to find someone in a particular department i could do so quicker by scanning the circle than i could by scanning a vertical list!

    I wonder though if moving anti-clockwise from 0° the type should have it’s oreintation flipped so that at 270° it is not being read upside down?

Leave a Reply